Time period | Number of Shots | A scores more | B scores more | Goals scored equal | A > B Significant | B > A significant |
Four Games | 96 | 51% | 38.1% | 10.9% | 7.4% | 3.9% |
Five Games | 120 | 51.9% | 38.7% | 9.4% | 7.6% | 3.8% |
Six Games | 144 | 54.1% | 37.5% | 8.4% | 7.8% | 3.4% |
Seven Games | 168 | 55.4% | 36.6% | 8% | 7.9% | 3.1% |
Second Round | 274 | 57.4% | 36.6% | 6% | 9% | 3.1% |
Conference Finals | 411 | 60.5% | 34.6% | 4.9% | 9.4% | 2.7% |
Stanley Cup Finals | 548 | 62.9% | 33.1% | 4% | 10.7% | 1.9% |
Something worth noting is that on average this gap in shooting from good to bad is worth a little less than a goal (0.88 goals) per series. Despite that, the team with less shooting talent still has between a 35% and 40% chance to get more goals at even strength in a series if they get the same number of shots, and another 8-10% shot at breaking even. The bounces don't always even out. That leaves a lot of room for luck, creating more shots and special teams.
But I thought it's a fact that "the bounces even out over the course of a seven-game series." Clearly, your data are wrong :)
ReplyDeleteQuite
ReplyDelete